Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 5 authors, 2012-06-07

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync

From: Zhao Chenhui <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-05 09:08:10
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:40:00AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/11/2012 06:53 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
quoted
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
+static struct ccsr_guts __iomem *guts;
+static u64 timebase;
+static int tb_req;
+static int tb_valid;
+
+static void mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(int freeze)
Why is this under CONFIG_KEXEC?  It'll also be needed for CPU hotplug.
Yes, the timebase sync is also needed for CPU hotplug, but this patch is unrelated to CPU hotplug.
I added CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU in the next patch.
quoted
+{
+	unsigned int mask;
+
+	if (!guts)
+		return;
+
+	mask = CCSR_GUTS_DEVDISR_TB0 | CCSR_GUTS_DEVDISR_TB1;
+	if (freeze)
+		setbits32(&guts->devdisr, mask);
+	else
+		clrbits32(&guts->devdisr, mask);
+
+	in_be32(&guts->devdisr);
+}
+
+static void mpc85xx_give_timebase(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
+	while (!tb_req)
+		barrier();
+	tb_req = 0;
+
+	mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(1);
+	timebase = get_tb();
+	mb();
+	tb_valid = 1;
+
+	while (tb_valid)
+		barrier();
+
+	mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(0);
+
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
+static void mpc85xx_take_timebase(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
+	tb_req = 1;
+	while (!tb_valid)
+		barrier();
+
+	set_tb(timebase >> 32, timebase & 0xffffffff);
+	mb();
+	tb_valid = 0;
+
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
I know you say this is for dual-core chips only, but it would be nice if
you'd write this in a way that doesn't assume that (even if the
corenet-specific timebase freezing comes later).
At this point, I have not thought about how to implement the cornet-specific timebase freezing.
Do we need an isync after setting the timebase, to ensure it's happened
before we enable the timebase?  Likewise, do we need a readback after
disabling the timebase to ensure it's disabled before we read the
timebase in give_timebase?
I checked the e500 core manual (Chapter 2.16 Synchronization Requirements for SPRs).
Only some SPR registers need an isync. The timebase registers do not.

I did a readback in mpc85xx_timebase_freeze().
quoted
 atomic_t kexec_down_cpus = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 void mpc85xx_smp_kexec_cpu_down(int crash_shutdown, int secondary)
@@ -228,6 +286,20 @@ smp_85xx_setup_cpu(int cpu_nr)
 		doorbell_setup_this_cpu();
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
+static const struct of_device_id guts_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1020-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1021-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1022-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1023-guts", },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-guts", },
+	{},
+};
+#endif
MPC8560 and MPC8536 are single-core...
Thanks. I will remove them.
Also please use a more specific name, such as e500v2_smp_guts_ids or
mpc85xx_smp_guts_ids -- when corenet support is added it will likely be
in the same file.
quoted
 void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
@@ -249,6 +321,19 @@ void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void)
 		smp_85xx_ops.cause_ipi = doorbell_cause_ipi;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
+	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, guts_ids);
+	if (np) {
+		guts = of_iomap(np, 0);
+		smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = mpc85xx_give_timebase;
+		smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = mpc85xx_take_timebase;
+		of_node_put(np);
+	} else {
+		smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = smp_generic_give_timebase;
+		smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = smp_generic_take_timebase;
+	}
Do not use smp_generic_give/take_timebase, ever.  If you don't have the
guts node, then just assume the timebase is already synced.

-Scott
smp_generic_give/take_timebase is the default in KEXEC before.
If do not set them, it may make KEXEC fail on other platforms.

-Chenhui
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help