Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync
From: Zhao Chenhui <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-05 09:08:10
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:40:00AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/11/2012 06:53 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:quoted
#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC +static struct ccsr_guts __iomem *guts; +static u64 timebase; +static int tb_req; +static int tb_valid; + +static void mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(int freeze)Why is this under CONFIG_KEXEC? It'll also be needed for CPU hotplug.
Yes, the timebase sync is also needed for CPU hotplug, but this patch is unrelated to CPU hotplug. I added CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU in the next patch.
quoted
+{ + unsigned int mask; + + if (!guts) + return; + + mask = CCSR_GUTS_DEVDISR_TB0 | CCSR_GUTS_DEVDISR_TB1; + if (freeze) + setbits32(&guts->devdisr, mask); + else + clrbits32(&guts->devdisr, mask); + + in_be32(&guts->devdisr); +} + +static void mpc85xx_give_timebase(void) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + local_irq_save(flags); + + while (!tb_req) + barrier(); + tb_req = 0; + + mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(1); + timebase = get_tb(); + mb(); + tb_valid = 1; + + while (tb_valid) + barrier(); + + mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(0); + + local_irq_restore(flags); +} + +static void mpc85xx_take_timebase(void) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + local_irq_save(flags); + + tb_req = 1; + while (!tb_valid) + barrier(); + + set_tb(timebase >> 32, timebase & 0xffffffff); + mb(); + tb_valid = 0; + + local_irq_restore(flags); +}I know you say this is for dual-core chips only, but it would be nice if you'd write this in a way that doesn't assume that (even if the corenet-specific timebase freezing comes later).
At this point, I have not thought about how to implement the cornet-specific timebase freezing.
Do we need an isync after setting the timebase, to ensure it's happened before we enable the timebase? Likewise, do we need a readback after disabling the timebase to ensure it's disabled before we read the timebase in give_timebase?
I checked the e500 core manual (Chapter 2.16 Synchronization Requirements for SPRs). Only some SPR registers need an isync. The timebase registers do not. I did a readback in mpc85xx_timebase_freeze().
quoted
atomic_t kexec_down_cpus = ATOMIC_INIT(0); void mpc85xx_smp_kexec_cpu_down(int crash_shutdown, int secondary)@@ -228,6 +286,20 @@ smp_85xx_setup_cpu(int cpu_nr) doorbell_setup_this_cpu(); } +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC +static const struct of_device_id guts_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,p1022-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,p1023-guts", }, + { .compatible = "fsl,p2020-guts", }, + {}, +}; +#endifMPC8560 and MPC8536 are single-core...
Thanks. I will remove them.
Also please use a more specific name, such as e500v2_smp_guts_ids or mpc85xx_smp_guts_ids -- when corenet support is added it will likely be in the same file.quoted
void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void) { struct device_node *np;@@ -249,6 +321,19 @@ void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void) smp_85xx_ops.cause_ipi = doorbell_cause_ipi; } +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, guts_ids); + if (np) { + guts = of_iomap(np, 0); + smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = mpc85xx_give_timebase; + smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = mpc85xx_take_timebase; + of_node_put(np); + } else { + smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = smp_generic_give_timebase; + smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = smp_generic_take_timebase; + }Do not use smp_generic_give/take_timebase, ever. If you don't have the guts node, then just assume the timebase is already synced. -Scott
smp_generic_give/take_timebase is the default in KEXEC before. If do not set them, it may make KEXEC fail on other platforms. -Chenhui