Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 9 authors, 2012-04-23

RE: [PATCH 5/9] dmaengine: provide a common function for completing a dma descriptor

flat view
STALE5282d

From: Boojin Kim <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-23 11:06:36
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

Vinod Koul wrote:
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:01 PM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: 'Stephen Warren'; 'Linus Walleij'; 'Srinidhi Kasagar'; Boojin Kim; 'Dan Williams'; 'Li Yang';
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] dmaengine: provide a common function for completing a dma descriptor

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:50 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 06:40:06PM +0900, Boojin Kim wrote:
quoted
I met a problem on DMA cyclic mode (DMA_CYCLIC) for sound playback.
Kernel BUG occurs during DMA transfer with DMA cyclic mode.
This patch makes the cookies into zero. But, cookies should be kept
during cyclic mode because cyclic mode re-uses the cookies.
The protection is there to prevent cookies being accidentally re-used.
If you're running a cyclic transfer, even then you shouldn't be completing
the same cookie time and time again - I think Vinod also concurs with this.
Right :)
I recently committed patch for imx-dma which doesn't mark the cyclic
descriptor as complete. Descriptor represents a transaction and makes no
sense to complete t if the transaction is still continuing.
Dear Vinod,
you already fixed it. :) thanks.
And I have other question. (Actually, It doesn't relate to this patch.)
I met the DMA probing fail problem on Linux 3.4.
It's because the return value on regulator_get() is changed
from ENODEV to EPROBE_DEFER in case not to supply a vcore regulator.
So, I try to change the check value about the return value of regulator_get()
in amba_get_enable_vcore()from ENODEV to EPROBE_DEFER.
How about it ? Do you already fix it too?

Thanks,
Boojin
quoted
I think our preference is for cyclic transfers to entire remain uncompleted,
or to get a new cookie each time they allegedly "complete".
No it is not complete. Cyclic never completes, it aborts when user
wants. The "notification" interrupt is for updating the
counters/notifying (timestamp/periods elapsed in sound), and shouldn't
be used for anything else

--
~Vinod


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help