On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:13 +0000, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedekind1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:51 PM
To: Kumar Gala
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; Liu Shuo-B35362; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org Kernel; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Andrew
Morton; David Woodhouse; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org list
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:

quoted

As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the

sequence

quoted

quoted

which did touch MTD.  Since that one is dependent on this patch,
wondering how we wanted to handle them.

I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to
merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches.

Hi Artem,

So what is your suggestion on this patch?  Can we regard your previous
email as an ACK and merge it through the powerpc tree?  Or do you
prefer to merge them through the MTD tree with Kumar's ACK instead?

I am fine if it is merged via PPC tree. I do not have bandwith to look
at it closely, so I cannot ack it, although I also do not have reasons
to nack it :-)

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy