Re: Relocatable kernel for ppc44x
From: Suzuki Poulose <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-15 14:40:49
On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:quoted
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:quoted
Hi, have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of patches towards this on PPC440x. But, I am stuck in debugging the hang that I am experiencing with the changes. I am setting up a RISCWatch processor probe to debug the same. Here is some information that I wanted to share : The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to : 1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M alignedWait a minute ... :-) There's a difference between having the kernel run from any address and mapping the linear mapping not starting at 0. Those are completely orthogonal. I don't see why off hand you are changing the way the TLB is used.
I started off with PHYSICAL_START support and that kind of hogged me into this approach :-). The
only possible change needed is to make sure the initial bolted entry set by the asm code properly covers the kernel in whatever it's "current" location is. The rest is a matter of fixing up the relocations...
Could we do something like, If kernel is loaded at X, 1. map : ((X-1) & ~256M) to PAGE_OFFSET and so on to cover the kernel in 256M chunks. 2. Then process the relocations with (X % 256M) Thanks Suzuki