David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 14 May 2007 13:11:23 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
quoted
quoted
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
@@ -327,9 +327,10 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
i2c->adap = mpc_ops;
+ i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id;
By the way: mpc_ops is a static i2c_adapter, so given that
the reason for using pdev->id that way was that there might
be more than one such platform device ... shouldn't allocation
of the adapter be moved into allocation of the "i2c->" object?
Or at least, add a check to ensure that the static mpc_ops
structure isn't in use before progressing this probe().
The mpc_ops struct is only used as a template; it gets copied into
i2c->adap for each adapter instance.
-Scott