Re: [i2c] [PATCH] Make i2c-mpc driver use i2c_add_numbered_adapter
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-15 15:51:44
On 5/15/07, David Brownell [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:quoted
On Mon, 14 May 2007 13:11:23 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
quoted
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c@@ -327,9 +327,10 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c); i2c->adap = mpc_ops; + i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id;By the way: mpc_ops is a static i2c_adapter, so given that the reason for using pdev->id that way was that there might be more than one such platform device ... shouldn't allocation of the adapter be moved into allocation of the "i2c->" object?
Take another look; this is a funny quirk of the driver. The assignment is 'i2c->adap = mpc_ops'; not 'i2c->adap = &mpc_ops'. And in struct mpc_i2c, the field is declared as 'struct i2c_adapter adap', not 'struct i2c_adapter *adap'. The driver instance gets a copy of the mpc_ops structure to initialize it, not a pointer to the staticly defined structure. I got bitten by the same thing when I was looking at the code. Not to mention that mpc_ops is poorly named. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195