Re: [PATCH] pci_alloc_consistent in an interrupt context
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2002-06-14 02:15:23
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 12:06:40PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:57:45PM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote:quoted
At 06:33 PM 6/13/2002, David Gibson wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:25:11PM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote:quoted
At 05:24 PM 6/13/2002, David Gibson wrote:quoted
That's right. But I think the patch below is a better fix for the problem. It makes consistent_alloc()/consistent_free() just do the right thing for both cache coherent and cache non-coherent processors, so we can get rid of the ifdef in pci_alloc_consistent() and pci_free_consistent().So, kmalloc will allocate non-cacheable memory? I seriously doubt it (actually I've just tested it:).No, but on cache coherent processors we don't need non-cacheable memory. That's the whole point. Likewise with __get_free_pages() which is what pci_alloc_consistent() uses on cache-coherent processors now.OK, I got it :) One problem though, kmalloc allocated memory will not be necessarily properly aligned as required by DMA-mappings.txt Some PCI drivers may break because of this.Ah, yes, indeed. How about this:
One last thing, did you mean to keep consistent_free as kfree() still and not free_pages() ? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/