On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 12:22 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 12:16 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
quoted
quoted
@@
expression SKB, C, S;
typedef u8;
identifier fn = {skb_put};
fresh identifier fn2 = fn ## "_u8";
@@
- *(u8 *)fn(SKB, S) = C;
+ fn2(SKB, C);
Note that due to the "C", the spatch isn't perfect, it should
have checked that C is 1, but there's also places that use a
Don't you mean "S" here?
Indeed, I mean S, will fix.
Perhaps
skb_put_data(skb, &c, sizeof(c))
as that avoids api expansion.
Optimizing the indirections and the size in a macro front-end
in skb_put_data may be better as it's would be completely
consistent for all use styles.