From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2017-06-16 12:42:53
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 05:04 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Perhaps
skb_put_data(skb, &c, sizeof(c))
as that avoids api expansion.
Hmm. Perhaps not.
That wouldn't work very well for constants
when some variant like skb_putchar/skb_put_u8
works perfectly.
I still think skb_putchar is nicer naming,
but perhaps the skb_put_u<size> is more
amenable to use with constants.