On 06/06/2011 12:51 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

W dniu 6 czerwca 2011 12:32 użytkownik George Kashperko
[off-list ref]  napisał:

quoted

Hi,

quoted

Hauke,

My idea for naming schema was to use:
bcma_host_TYPE_*

Like:
bcma_host_pci_*
bcma_host_sdio_*

You are using:
bcma_host_bcma_*

What do you think about changing this to:
bcma_host_embedded_*
or just some:
bcma_host_emb_*
?

Does it make more sense to you? I was trying to keep names in bcma
really clear, so every first-time-reader can see differences between
hosts, host and driver, etc.

how about bcma_host_soc ?

We get then inconsistency with "BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED". I'd like to
1) See something like bcma_host_emb...
xor
2) Use bcma_host_soc_* and BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC

I would go for option 2). It more clearly says what it is. Embedded is a 
broader term. As an example, a handset is an embedded device, but it may 
use BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SDIO.

Gr. AvS

-- 
Almost nobody dances sober, unless they happen to be insane.
-- H.P. Lovecraft --