Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/10] bcm47xx: fix irq assignment for new SoCs.
From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-06 09:25:26
Also in:
linux-mips
Hello. On 06-06-2011 2:07, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens<hauke@hauke-m.de> --- arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c index 325757a..3642cee 100644 --- a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c +++ b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -51,5 +52,12 @@ void plat_irq_dispatch(void) void __init arch_init_irq(void) { + if (bcm47xx_active_bus_type == BCM47XX_BUS_TYPE_BCMA) { + bcma_write32(bcm47xx_bus.bcma.drv_mips.core, + BCMA_MIPS_MIPS74K_INTMASK(5), 1<< 31); + /* the kernel reads the timer irq from some register and thinks + * it's #5, but we offset it by 2 and route to #7 */
The preferred style for the multi-line comments is this:
/*
* bla
* bla
*/
WBR, Sergei