Re: [RFC] IMA Log Snapshotting Design Proposal
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2023-08-30 22:24:05
Also in:
kexec, linux-integrity
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 6:21 PM Paul Moore [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 5:50 PM Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 4:25 PM Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Your initial question was "what happens if the file/filesystem becomes inaccessible at some point and an attestation client attempts to read the entire log?". For what reason would it be inaccessible? For the original single tmpfs file, what would make it inaccessible?In your reply that I had responded to you had mentioned that the kernel was simply being passed a fd and taking ownership of it, the fd could either be a tmpfs backed file or some form of persistent storage as both were discussed in this thread. I imagine a tmpfs filesystem could still be forcibly unmounted, resulting in problems, but I can't say that for certain. However, there are definitely cases where a fd backed against an arbitrary filesystem could run into problems: storage device issues for local filesystems, networking issues for network filesystems, and good old fashioned user/admin intervention in both cases."I imagine tmpfs filesystem could still be forcibly unmounted" sounds like an attack. Not being able to verify the measurement list against a quote is probably a good thing.Okay, can you answer the question for an arbitrary persistent filesystem? That was always the more important question, and your continued avoidance is getting me increasingly annoyed.
Speaking of being annoyed, I'm fixing Tushar's email as the bounces are also driving me nuts. -- paul-moore.com