Thread (61 messages) 61 messages, 10 authors, 2020-08-14

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/11] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-08-07 17:32:39
Also in: dm-devel, linux-block, linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, lkml

On Sat, 2020-08-08 at 02:41 +1000, James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 09:51 +1000, James Morris wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
If block layer integrity was enough, there wouldn't have been a need
for fs-verity.   Even fs-verity is limited to read only filesystems,
which makes validating file integrity so much easier.  From the
beginning, we've said that fs-verity signatures should be included in
the measurement list.  (I thought someone signed on to add that support
to IMA, but have not yet seen anything.)

Going forward I see a lot of what we've accomplished being incorporated
into the filesystems.  When IMA will be limited to defining a system
wide policy, I'll have completed my job.
What are your thoughts on IPE being a standalone LSM? Would you prefer to 
see its functionality integrated into IMA?
Improving the integrity subsystem would be preferred.
Are you planning to attend Plumbers? Perhaps we could propose a BoF 
session on this topic.
That sounds like a good idea.

Mimi

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help