Thread (61 messages) 61 messages, 10 authors, 2020-08-14

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/11] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-08-06 17:38:32
Also in: dm-devel, linux-block, linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, lkml

On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 09:51 +1000, James Morris wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
If block layer integrity was enough, there wouldn't have been a need
for fs-verity.   Even fs-verity is limited to read only filesystems,
which makes validating file integrity so much easier.  From the
beginning, we've said that fs-verity signatures should be included in
the measurement list.  (I thought someone signed on to add that support
to IMA, but have not yet seen anything.)

Going forward I see a lot of what we've accomplished being incorporated
into the filesystems.  When IMA will be limited to defining a system
wide policy, I'll have completed my job.
What are your thoughts on IPE being a standalone LSM? Would you prefer to 
see its functionality integrated into IMA?
Improving the integrity subsystem would be preferred.

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help