Firmware signing -- Re: [PATCH 00/27] security, efi: Add kernel lockdown
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
Date: 2017-11-14 12:39:02
Also in:
linux-efi, lkml
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
Date: 2017-11-14 12:39:02
Also in:
linux-efi, lkml
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:21:38AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 14:09 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:quoted
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:44 PM, David Howells [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Whilst that may be true, we either have to check signatures on every bit of firmware that the appropriate driver doesn't say is meant to be signed or not bother.I vote for "not bother". Seriously, if you have firmware in /lib/firmware, and you don't trust it, what the hell are you doing?I might "trust" the files in /lib/firmware, but I also want to make sure that they haven't changed. ?File signatures provide file provenance and integrity guarantees.
Then "verify" them with signatures that you generate yourself. Like dm-verify does for the partition that you put the firmware on. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html