On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 21:30 +0000, David Howells wrote:
Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
By this point, IMA-appraisal has already verified the kernel module
signature back in kernel_read_file_from_fd(), if it was required.
?Having a key with which to verify the appended signature or requiring
an appended signature, should not be required as well.
I guess I don't need to put in any support for IMA here, then, and you've
taken care of it in your patchset such that it won't actually go into
module_sig_check() in that case (or will at least return immediately).
Right, it would never get here if the IMA signature verification
fails. ?If sig_enforce is not enabled, then it will also work. ?So the
only case is if sig_enforced is enabled and there is no key.
eg.
? ? ? ? ?else if (can_do_ima_check && is_ima_appraise_enabled())
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? err = 0;
Mimi?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html