Re: [PATCH V5 08/20] rtla: Helper functions for rtla

Hi Tao

Thanks for your reviews!

On 10/26/21 18:22, Tao Zhou wrote:

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:40:33PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:

quoted

This is a set of utils and tracer helper functions. They are used by
rtla mostly to parse config, display data and some trace operations that
are not part of libtracefs (because they are only useful it for this
case).

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <redacted>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
---
 tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++
 tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.h |  27 ++
 tools/tracing/rtla/src/utils.c | 433 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/tracing/rtla/src/utils.h |  56 +++++
 4 files changed, 735 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.c
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.h
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/src/utils.c
 create mode 100644 tools/tracing/rtla/src/utils.h

diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0f66e99fef0d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/trace.c

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <sys/sendfile.h>
+#include <tracefs.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+
+#include "trace.h"
+#include "utils.h"
+
+/*
+ * enable_tracer_by_name - enable a tracer on the given instance
+ */
+int enable_tracer_by_name(struct tracefs_instance *inst, const char *tracer)
+{
+	enum tracefs_tracers t;
+	int retval;
+
+	t = TRACEFS_TRACER_CUSTOM;
+
+	debug_msg("enabling %s tracer\n", tracer);
+
+	retval = tracefs_tracer_set(inst, t, tracer);
+	if (retval < 0) {
+		if (errno == ENODEV)
+			err_msg("tracer %s not found!\n", tracer);
+
+		err_msg("failed to enable the tracer %s\n", tracer);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * disable_tracer - set nop tracer to the insta
+ */
+void disable_tracer(struct tracefs_instance *inst)
+{
+	enum tracefs_tracers t = TRACEFS_TRACER_NOP;
+	int retval;
+
+	retval = tracefs_tracer_set(inst, t);

Thank you for share. Also not know much about trace..
Nits below.

enable_tracer_by_name() call tracefs_tracer_set(inst, t, tracer).
Is tracefs_tracer_set() called here lack a NULL; like:

  tracefs_tracer_set(inst, t, NULL)

Or I am wrong.

I am just following documentation:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libtrace/libtracefs.git/tree/Documentation/libtracefs-tracer.txt#n14

quoted

+	if (retval < 0)
+		err_msg("oops, error disabling tracer\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * create_instance - create a trace instance with *instance_name
+ */
+struct tracefs_instance *create_instance(char *instance_name)
+{
+	return tracefs_instance_create(instance_name);
+}
+
+/*
+ * destroy_instance - remove a trace instance and free the data
+ */
+void destroy_instance(struct tracefs_instance *inst)
+{
+	tracefs_instance_destroy(inst);
+	tracefs_instance_free(inst);
+}
+
+/*
+ * save_trace_to_file - save the trace output of the instance to the file
+ */
+int save_trace_to_file(struct tracefs_instance *inst, const char *filename)
+{
+	const char *file = "trace";
+	mode_t mode = 0644;
+	char *buffer[4096];
+	int out_fd, in_fd;
+	int retval = -1;
+
+	in_fd = tracefs_instance_file_open(inst, file, O_RDONLY);
+	if (in_fd < 0) {
+		err_msg("Failed to open trace file\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	out_fd = creat(filename, mode);
+	if (out_fd < 0) {
+		err_msg("Failed to create output file %s\n", filename);
+		goto out_close;
+	}
+
+	do {
+		retval = read(in_fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
+		if (read <= 0)

check "retval" not read. Like:

  if (retval <= 0)

I bet vim's ^p helped on that.... fixing in a new version.

quoted

+			goto out_close;
+
+		retval = write(out_fd, buffer, retval);
+		if (retval < 0)
+			goto out_close;
+	} while (retval > 0);
+
+	retval = 0;
+	close(out_fd);
+out_close:

And this out_close: label put before "close(out_fd);". Like:

  retval = 0;
out_close:
  close(out_fd);
  close(in_fd);

Actually, I need to add another label, one to close onlu in_fd, and another to
close all... anyway, yep, there is an error here.

Thanks
-- Daniel