Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 5/9] adaptive real-time lock support
From: Gregory Haskins <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-26 18:08:59
Also in:
lkml
quoted
quoted
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:06 PM, in message
[ref], Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue 2008-02-26 08:03:43, Gregory Haskins wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM, in message[ref], Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
+static inline void +prepare_adaptive_wait(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct adaptive_waiter*adaptive) ...quoted
+#define prepare_adaptive_wait(lock, busy) {}This is evil. Use empty inline function instead (same for the other function, there you can maybe get away with it).I went to implement your suggested change and I remembered why I did it thisway: I wanted a macro so that the "struct adaptive_waiter" local variable will fall away without an #ifdef in the main body of code. So I have left this logic alone for now. Hmm, but inline function will allow dead code elimination, too, no?
I was getting compile errors. Might be operator-error ;)
Anyway non-evil way to do it with macro is
#define prepare_adaptive_wait(lock, busy) do {} while (0)
...that behaves properly in complex statements.Ah, I was wondering why people use that. Will do. Thanks! -Greg