Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 3/9] rearrange rt_spin_lock sleep
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-25 21:54:37
Also in:
lkml
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2008-02-25 21:54:37
Also in:
lkml
Hi!
@@ -720,7 +728,8 @@ rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) * saved_state accordingly. If we did not get a real wakeup * then we return with the saved state. */ - saved_state = xchg(¤t->state, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + saved_state = current->state; + smp_mb(); for (;;) { unsigned long saved_flags;
Please document what the barrier is good for. Plus, you are replacing atomic operation with nonatomic; is that ok? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html