On 8/24/22 12:09, Coly Li wrote:

quoted

2022年8月24日 23:56，Jes Sorensen [off-list ref] 写道：

quoted

Hi Jes,

Please check the version I post to you in series “mdadm-CI for-jes/20220728: patches for merge” (Message-Id: [ref]), the patch in this series is rebased and confirmed with Mateusz, it could be applied to upstream mdadm.

quoted

I applied this one, but none of the versions applied cleanly. I had to
play formail games to pull it out of your stack, as I am not going to
apply a set of 23 commits in one batch without going through them.

These days I was in partner’s office and planed to repost the rebased version soon. If you don’t do the rebase yet, please wait for me to post a v4 version on behavior of Mateusz tomorrow.

No worries, I already pulled some of it in, but you can check my repo
and see whats there.

quoted

It's really awesome to have your help reviewing patches, much
appreciated, but I would prefer to keep them in the original batches so
I can pull them from patchwork, rather than trying to deal with the
giant stack.

How about we improve the process like this,
1) I will continue to review and response the patches from the original emails, so patch work may track them as they were.
2) For all the reviewed patches are not handled by your after a period, let’s set it as 2 weeks for now, I will post a email with all the patches with their message-IDs to you as a remind.

This sounds good to me! I think it's also fine to have a branch with
everything applied for testing, it's just less easy for me to pull from.

Thanks,
Jes