On 2022-04-26 19:36, Guoqing Jiang wrote:

On 4/21/22 3:54 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:

quoted

    /* we only do back search */
-static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf, struct
stripe_head *sh)
+static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf,
+        struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head *last_sh)

Nit, from stripe_add_to_batch_list's view, I think "head_sh" makes more
sense than
"last_sh".

That made sense to me, but upon a closer look while making the change, I
think it's not a good idea:

stripe_add_to_batch_list() already has a stripe_head variable called
"head". If it now has an argument called "head_sh", it becomes very
confusing. This statement wouldn't make any sense:
+    if (last_sh && head_sector == last_sh->sector) {
+        head = last_sh;
+        atomic_inc(&head->count);
+    } else {

If it was changed to "head = head_sh" what would that even mean?

From stripe_add_to_batch_list's perspective, it is the "last" stripe
head. And it then decides whether the it is the correct stripe to use as
the head of the list to add to.

So I decline to make this change.

Thanks,

Logan