Re: Triple parity and beyond

Hi David,

quoted

The choice of ZFS to use powers of 4 was likely not optimal,
because to multiply by 4, it has to do two multiplications by 2.

I can agree with that.  I didn't copy ZFS's choice here

David, it was not my intention to suggest that you copied from ZFS.
Sorry to have expressed myself badly. I just mentioned ZFS because it's
an implementation that I know uses powers of 4 to generate triple
parity, and I saw in the code that it's implemented with two multiplication
by 2.

Ciao,
Andrea