Thread (85 messages) flat view 85 messages, 22 authors, 2005-03-01

RE: ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard)

From: Guy <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-05 18:26:30

You forgot one!
Peter said: "There might be a small temporal displacement."

This worries me!  RED ALERT!
Beam me up!  Wait, I will take the shuttle craft please.
"You cannot change the laws of physics!" - Scotty

But, really, I do understand what Peter is saying.  It just seemed too funny
to me.  And since I have disk read errors more than temporal displacement, I
need RAID more than a temporal dampening field.  Maybe a temporal phase
converter?

And, a single non-RAID disk can suffer from temporal displacement.

I love Star Trek, so I love temporal displacements!  :)

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: David Greaves [mailto:david@dgreaves.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:27 PM
To: Guy
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10
crashing repeatedly and hard)

Guy wrote:
RAID does not cause bad data!
 
Guy - how can you speak such heresy!!      ;)
Haven't you seen the special 'make_undetectable_error(float p)' function?
Bad data can get on any disk, even if it is part of a RAID system.
The bad data does not come from the hard disk, CRCs prevent that.

The problem is:  Where does the bad data come from?
Bad memory?  No, everyone use ECC memory, right?
 
I like to blame cosmic rays - I just like the image ;)

Of course voltage fluctuations, e/m interference, thermal variations, 
mechanical interfaces, dust capacitance/resistance, insects shorts... 
anywhere inside the tin box between the media and the corners of the 
motherboard. It's amazing that some machines even boot.

David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help