Thread (80 messages) 80 messages, 7 authors, 2018-09-27

Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: request CAP_SYS_ADMIN by default

From: Patrick Bellasi <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-24 17:24:00
Also in: lkml

On 24-Sep 17:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 04:14:00PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
quoted
On 21-Sep 11:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
Laptops with active cooling however...
How do you see active cooling playing a role ?

Are you thinking, for example, at reduced fan noise if we remain below
a certain OPP ?

Are you factoring fans power consumptions into the overall P consumption ?
Nothing as fancy as that; I just figured that with a larger cooling
capacity, you can push chips higher onto that curve past the optimal
IPC/Watt point. Make it go fast etc..
That very concept of "optimal IPC/Watt" point is not something easy to
define considering a monotonic function and without considering the
specific optimization goals.

It really sounds like saying that an LP problem has a unique solution
independently from the optimization function.

Do you think we should "mandate" an optimization function from kernel
space? I'm not saying it does not make sense, but I find it at least a
strong implementation enforcement.

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help