Thread (80 messages) 80 messages, 7 authors, 2018-09-27

Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] sched/core: uclamp: map TASK's clamp values into CPU's clamp groups

From: Patrick Bellasi <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-14 08:47:13
Also in: lkml

On 13-Sep 21:20, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 06:42:09PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
quoted
On 12-Sep 18:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:53:10PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
 {
+	int group_id[UCLAMP_CNT] = { UCLAMP_NOT_VALID };
+	int lower_bound, upper_bound;
+	struct uclamp_se *uc_se;
+	int result = 0;
I think the thing would become much more readable if you set
lower/upper_bound right here.
quoted
Actually it could also make sense to have them before the mutex ;)
Indeed.

+               upper_bound = (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MAX)
+                       ? attr->sched_util_max
+                       : p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value;
+
+               if (upper_bound == UCLAMP_NOT_VALID)
+                       upper_bound = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
+               if (attr->sched_util_min > upper_bound) {
+                       result = -EINVAL;
+                       goto done;
+               }
+
+               result = uclamp_group_find(UCLAMP_MIN, attr->sched_util_min);
+               if (result == -ENOSPC) {
+                       pr_err(UCLAMP_ENOSPC_FMT, "MIN");
+                       goto done;
+               }
+               group_id[UCLAMP_MIN] = result;
+       }
+       if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MAX) {
+               lower_bound = (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN)
+                       ? attr->sched_util_min
+                       : p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value;
+
+               if (lower_bound == UCLAMP_NOT_VALID)
+                       lower_bound = 0;
+               if (attr->sched_util_max < lower_bound ||
+                   attr->sched_util_max > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) {
+                       result = -EINVAL;
+                       goto done;
+               }

That would end up soething like:

	unsigned int lower_bound = p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value;
	unsigned int upper_bound = p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value;

	if (sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN)
		lower_bound = attr->sched_util_min;

	if (sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MAX)
		upper_bound = attr->sched_util_max;

	if (lower_bound > upper_bound ||
	    upper_bound > SCHED_CAPACITY_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;

	mutex_lock(...);
Yes... much cleaner, thanks.

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help