Thread (155 messages) 155 messages, 12 authors, 2016-03-18

Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] cpufreq: schedutil: New governor based on scheduler utilization data

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-03-16 17:52:16
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
+static void sugov_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = container_of(work, struct sugov_policy, work);
+
+	mutex_lock(&sg_policy->work_lock);
+	__cpufreq_driver_target(sg_policy->policy, sg_policy->next_freq,
+				CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+	mutex_unlock(&sg_policy->work_lock);
+
Be aware that the below store can creep up and become visible before the
unlock. AFAICT that doesn't really matter, but still.
+	sg_policy->work_in_progress = false;
+}
+
+static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
+{
+	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
+
+	sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
+	schedule_work(&sg_policy->work);
+}
If you care what cpu the work runs on, you should schedule_work_on(),
regular schedule_work() can end up on any random cpu (although typically
it does not).

In particular schedule_work() -> queue_work() -> queue_work_on(.cpu =
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) -> __queue_work() if (req_cpu == UNBOUND) cpu =
wq_select_unbound_cpu(), which has a Round-Robin 'feature' to detect
just such dependencies.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help