On 03-03-16, 20:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

So this is a totally bicycle shed discussion argument which makes it
seriously irritating.

Does it really matter so much how this structure is called?
Essentially, it is something to build your tunables structure around
and you can treat it as a counterpart of a C++ abstract class.  So the
name *does* make sense in that context.

:(

I thought you will apply this patch to linux-next *now*, as it was quite
independent and so gave such comment.

That said, what about gov_attr_set?

Maybe just gov_kobj or whatever you wish. 

-- 
viresh