Re: [RFC PATCH 05/16] x86/efi: Get entropy through EFI random number generator protocol
From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
Date: 2015-07-31 09:59:17
Also in:
linux-efi, lkml
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2015-07-16 22:25:19, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:quoted
To grab random numbers through EFI protocol as one of the entropies source of swsusp key, this patch adds the logic for accessing EFI RNG (random number generator) protocol that's introduced since UEFI 2.4. Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> --- arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi_random.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/efi.h | 46 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 239 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi_random.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi_random.c index bdb2d46..1f5c63d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi_random.c +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi_random.c@@ -2,6 +2,191 @@ #include <linux/efi.h> #include <asm/archrandom.h> +#include <asm/efi.h> + +static efi_status_t efi_locate_rng(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, + void ***rng_handle) +{ + efi_guid_t rng_proto = EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID; + unsigned long size = 0; + efi_status_t status; + + status = efi_call_early(locate_handle, + EFI_LOCATE_BY_PROTOCOL, + &rng_proto, NULL, &size, *rng_handle); + + if (status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) { + status = efi_call_early(allocate_pool, + EFI_LOADER_DATA, + size, (void **)rng_handle); + + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { + efi_printk(sys_table, " Failed to alloc mem for rng_handle"); + return status; + } + + status = efi_call_early(locate_handle, + EFI_LOCATE_BY_PROTOCOL, &rng_proto, + NULL, &size, *rng_handle); + } + + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { + efi_printk(sys_table, " Failed to locateEFI_RNG_PROTOCOL");missing \n?
Originally those logs just follow a "EFI random" as a complete line. After removed "EFI random", I will add "\n" back to those log.
quoted
+ goto free_handle;You use that label exactly once, no need for goto
OK, I will remove free_handle label.
quoted
+static bool efi_rng_supported32(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void **rng_handle) +{ + const struct efi_config *efi_early = __efi_early(); + efi_rng_protocol_32 *rng = NULL;...> +static bool efi_rng_supported64(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void **rng_handle)quoted
+{ + const struct efi_config *efi_early = __efi_early(); + efi_rng_protocol_64 *rng = NULL; + efi_guid_t rng_proto = EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID;...quoted
+static unsigned long efi_get_rng32(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, + void **rng_handle) +{ + const struct efi_config *efi_early = __efi_early(); + efi_rng_protocol_32 *rng = NULL; + efi_guid_t rng_proto = EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID;...quoted
+static unsigned long efi_get_rng64(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, + void **rng_handle) +{ + const struct efi_config *efi_early = __efi_early(); + efi_rng_protocol_64 *rng = NULL; + efi_guid_t rng_proto = EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID;Can you do something to avoid each function having two very similar versions of these functions?
They are similar but I want follow the style in eboot.c. On the other hand, it's earlier to locate problem on 32-bit or 64-bit EFI. So, I will keep the above codes.
quoted
+ if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { + efi_printk(sys_table, " Failed to get RNG value "); + efi_printk(sys_table, efi_status_to_str(status));Yep. You definitely have \n problems here.
Thanks, I will add \n here also.
quoted
--- a/include/linux/efi.h +++ b/include/linux/efi.h@@ -427,6 +427,16 @@ typedef struct { #define EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_VGA_PALETTE_IO_16 0x20000 #define EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_VGA_IO_16 0x40000 +typedef struct { + u32 get_info; + u32 get_rng; +} efi_rng_protocol_32; + +typedef struct { + u64 get_info; + u64 get_rng; +} efi_rng_protocol_64;We don't typedef structs usually... Make it union so you can have just one
I want to follow the style as efi_pci_io_protocolxxx in efi.h. So I will keep it.
quoted
+static inline char *efi_status_to_str(efi_status_t status) +{ + char *str; +Are you sure you want this inlined?
It's inlined because in header file. Currently it's only used by efi_random.c, I will move it to efi_random.
quoted
+ switch (status) { + case EFI_SUCCESS: + str = "EFI_SUCCESS"; + break;Can you use macros to reduce code duplication here? Pavel
I will try to reduce duplicate code. Thanks Joey Lee