Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] Thermal: Add ST-Ericsson DB8500 thermal dirver.
From: Hongbo Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-25 10:43:58
Also in:
lkml
On 25 October 2012 17:42, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
On 25 October 2012 15:03, Hongbo Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 25 October 2012 16:41, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Just paste my current pieces of codes here: static struct db8500_thsens_platform_data* db8500_thermal_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) {quoted
if (!np) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing device tree data\n");quoted
} static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {quoted
ptrips = db8500_thermal_parse_dt(pdev); if (!ptrips) ptrips = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);So, the above code still has the flaw i pointed out. It will print "Missing device tree data", while booting for non-DT case. What i would suggest you is: static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; if (np) ptrips = db8500_thermal_parse_dt(pdev); else ptrips = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); if (!ptrips) explode!!
This seems neat.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, low_irq, NULL,quoted
I just saw that all the PRCMU and ab8500 related irqs use request_threaded_irq only difference is that I use devm_request_threaded_irqSee, i started this threaded_irq thread is to make sure you know exactly what you are doing. Others are doing it doesn't mean you should do it too.. :) You must dig in a bit to see why is it required for your case? If earlier code related to PRCMU and db8500 is correct, then i am sure you need to sleep from your handler. -- viresh