Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] Thermal: Add ST-Ericsson DB8500 thermal dirver.
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2012-10-25 09:42:17
Also in:
lkml
On 25 October 2012 15:03, Hongbo Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
On 25 October 2012 16:41, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
Just paste my current pieces of codes here:
static struct db8500_thsens_platform_data*
db8500_thermal_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
{ if (!np) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing device tree data\n");}
static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{ ptrips = db8500_thermal_parse_dt(pdev);
if (!ptrips)
ptrips = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
So, the above code still has the flaw i pointed out. It will print
"Missing device tree data", while booting for non-DT case.
What i would suggest you is:
static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
if (np)
ptrips = db8500_thermal_parse_dt(pdev);
else
ptrips = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
if (!ptrips)
explode!!
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, low_irq, NULL,
I just saw that all the PRCMU and ab8500 related irqs use request_threaded_irq only difference is that I use devm_request_threaded_irq
See, i started this threaded_irq thread is to make sure you know exactly what you are doing. Others are doing it doesn't mean you should do it too.. :) You must dig in a bit to see why is it required for your case? If earlier code related to PRCMU and db8500 is correct, then i am sure you need to sleep from your handler. -- viresh