-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 2:13 PM
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <redacted>; 'Krzysztof
Kozlowski' [off-list ref]
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;

[snip]

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Ok got it. Will change supplies name as below avdd075_usb =>
avdd075-usb
avdd18_usb20 => avdd18-usb20
avdd33_usb20 => avdd33-usb20

Confirm the above change that is meant in terms of DTS style.

Yes. I have doubts that actual supplies have suffix usb20. Are
there more than one avdd18 for this block?

Yes, there are more than one vdd18 supplies for this block.

And their names are?

quoted

Re-analysed your comment on adding new supplies.
Going to re-use existing supplies as mentioned below, rather than
introducing new supplies

  dvdd-usb20-supply   => for 0.75v
  vddh-usb20-supply   => for 1.8v
  vdd33-usb20-supply => for 3.3v

You just expect us to guess whether this is correct...

Sorry about not being clear so far.

V920 needs three supplies, 0.75v, 1.8v and 3.3v for USB PHY The naming
convention used in the schematic are avdd075-usb, avdd18_usb20,
avdd33_usb20.

However, PHY's user manual just mentions DVDD, VDD33 and VDD18.

Then dvdd, vdd33 and vdd18.

quoted

Since GS101 binding already using supply names similar to what is

mentioned in the PHY user manual.


GS101 has USB 2.0 and DP, thus the suffix made some sense. I think you have
only USB 2.0, that's why I question the suffix.

I cross checked the schematic of v920 SADK, this is a combo PHY which support USB-3.0 as well. 
@ Pritam
Schema should capture all the supplies including USB-3.0, similar to GS101 (which has USB2.0 and DP combo).
So that would be as below:
dvdd075-usb20-supply
vdd18-usb20-supply
vdd33-usb20-supply
dvdd075-usb30-supply
vdd18-usb30-supply
please cross check the supply at your end and do the needful. 

Best regards,
Krzysztof

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy