Re: [PATCH] mm: add config NUMA stub to all architectures
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-17 23:39:25
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- (unnamed) [application/pgp-signature] 836 bytes
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-17 23:39:25
Also in:
lkml
Hi Sam, On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:44:04 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Seems like Kconfig allow config option duplication, but it use default state from first. If we add "config NUMA\n def_bool n" somewhere in generic Kconfig, default will be n if Kconfig see this declaration first.Correct. And as n is default there is no need to specify it. But please add a help text that explain the symbol - even if it is not visible in menuconfig.
So does that mean that a simple config NUMA bool help some help text in mm/Kconfig will have no effect on the defaults and dependencies if "config NUMA" is specified elsewhere? (except to add the needed __enabled_CONFIG_NUMA defines, of course). If that is the case, then that is what we should add, right? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au