Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

* Vegard Nossum [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to 
never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the 
index only got introduced by Mike's patch.

the one below is needed as well i think.

Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even 
that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.

yep, just discovered that we had them already ;-)

Thomas has just scripted up a new "detect if a commit is not in 
linux-next yet" script that should avoid such problems in the future.

your second patch is still wanted, it would have detected the problem 
earlier.

	Ingo