Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-06 07:17:39
Also in:
lkml
* Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:52:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.gitInstantly oopses on two x86_64 boxes with this config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt oops: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/p6056454.jpg At a guess I'd say the sched_domains code is calling into slab before slab is initalised. Something like that.
did SLUB change in linux-next? There no such problem in -tip.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
I had to do this:--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c~a +++ a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c@@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs } } printk("\n"); + for ( ;; ); } int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long ip)_ to collect that oops. Otherwise it scrolled away due to "trying to kill init" doing a dump_stack. pause_on_oops seems to not be working properly any more. It used to.
hm, perhaps mdelay(1) does not loop for 1 msec anymore? You'll probably be able to work it around via pause_on_oops=5000000 or so. Ingo