Thread (53 messages) 53 messages, 6 authors, 2008-06-18

Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

From: Vegard Nossum <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-06 15:14:21
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Subject: [PATCH] sched: don't call node_to_cpumask() on nodes >
nr_node_ids
AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to
never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the index
only got introduced by Mike's patch.
the one below is needed as well i think.
Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even
that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help