Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 5 authors, 2021-05-31

Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm/page_alloc: Introduce vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction

From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-28 11:59:41
Also in: lkml

On 5/25/21 10:01 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
This introduces a new sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction. It is
similar to the old vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction. The old sysctl increased
both pcp->batch and pcp->high with the higher pcp->high potentially
reducing zone->lock contention. However, the higher pcp->batch value also
potentially increased allocation latency while the PCP was refilled.
This sysctl only adjusts pcp->high so that zone->lock contention is
potentially reduced but allocation latency during a PCP refill remains
the same.

  # grep -E "high:|batch" /proc/zoneinfo | tail -2
              high:  649
              batch: 63

  # sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction=8
  # grep -E "high:|batch" /proc/zoneinfo | tail -2
              high:  35071
              batch: 63

  # sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction=64
              high:  4383
              batch: 63

  # sysctl vm.percpu_pagelist_high_fraction=0
              high:  649
              batch: 63

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <redacted>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <redacted>

Documentation nit below:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -789,6 +790,25 @@ panic_on_oom=2+kdump gives you very strong tool to investigate
 why oom happens. You can get snapshot.
 
 
+percpu_pagelist_high_fraction
+=============================
+
+This is the fraction of pages in each zone that are allocated for each
+per cpu page list.  The min value for this is 8.  It means that we do
+not allow more than 1/8th of pages in each zone to be allocated in any
+single per_cpu_pagelist.
This, while technically correct (as an upper limit) is somewhat misleading as
the limit for a single per_cpu_pagelist also considers the number of local cpus.
 This entry only changes the value of hot per
+cpu pagelists. User can specify a number like 100 to allocate 1/100th
+of each zone to each per cpu page list.
This is worse. Anyone trying to reproduce this example on a system with multiple
cpus per node and checking the result will be puzzled.
So I think the part about number of local cpus should be mentioned to avoid
confusion.
+The batch value of each per cpu pagelist remains the same regardless of the
+value of the high fraction so allocation latencies are unaffected.
+
+The initial value is zero. Kernel uses this value to set the high pcp->high
+mark based on the low watermark for the zone and the number of local
+online CPUs.  If the user writes '0' to this sysctl, it will revert to
+this default behavior.
+
+
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help