Re: [PATCH 5/5] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma()
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2012-12-04 14:24:09
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
memory management, the rest, tmpfs (shmem filesystem) · Maintainers:
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Hugh Dickins
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:54:08PM +0200, Tommi Rantala wrote:
2012/10/9 Mel Gorman [off-list ref]:quoted
commit 00442ad04a5eac08a98255697c510e708f6082e2 upstream. Commit cc9a6c877661 ("cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3") introduced a potential memory corruption. shmem_alloc_page() uses a pseudo vma and it has one significant unique combination, vma->vm_ops=NULL and vma->policy->flags & MPOL_F_SHARED. get_vma_policy() does NOT increase a policy ref when vma->vm_ops=NULL and mpol_cond_put() DOES decrease a policy ref when a policy has MPOL_F_SHARED. Therefore, when a cpuset update race occurs, alloc_pages_vma() falls in 'goto retry_cpuset' path, decrements the reference count and frees the policy prematurely.Hello, kmemleak is complaining about memory leaks that point to the mbind() syscall. I've seen this only in v3.7-rcX, so I bisected this, and found that this patch is the first mainline commit where I'm able to reproduce it with Trinity.
Uncool. I'm writing this from an airport so am not in the position to test properly but at a glance I'm not seeing what drops the reference count taken by mpol_shared_policy_lookup() in all cases. vm_ops->get_policy() probably gets it right but what about shmem_alloc_page() and shmem_swapin()? This patch is only compile tested. If the reference counts are dropped somewhere I did not spot quickly then it'll cause a use-after-free bug instead but is worth trying anyway.
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 89341b6..6229a43 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c@@ -912,6 +912,7 @@ static struct page *shmem_swapin(swp_entry_t swap, gfp_t gfp, { struct mempolicy mpol, *spol; struct vm_area_struct pvma; + struct page *page; spol = mpol_cond_copy(&mpol, mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&info->policy, index));
@@ -922,13 +923,19 @@ static struct page *shmem_swapin(swp_entry_t swap, gfp_t gfp, pvma.vm_pgoff = index + info->vfs_inode.i_ino; pvma.vm_ops = NULL; pvma.vm_policy = spol; - return swapin_readahead(swap, gfp, &pvma, 0); + page = swapin_readahead(swap, gfp, &pvma, 0); + + /* Drop reference taken by mpol_shared_policy_lookup() */ + mpol_cond_put(pvma.vm_policy); + + return page; } static struct page *shmem_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp, struct shmem_inode_info *info, pgoff_t index) { struct vm_area_struct pvma; + struct page *page; /* Create a pseudo vma that just contains the policy */ pvma.vm_start = 0;
@@ -940,7 +947,12 @@ static struct page *shmem_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp, /* * alloc_page_vma() will drop the shared policy reference */ - return alloc_page_vma(gfp, &pvma, 0); + page = alloc_page_vma(gfp, &pvma, 0); + + /* Drop reference taken by mpol_shared_policy_lookup() */ + mpol_cond_put(pvma.vm_policy); + + return page; } #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */ #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS --
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>