Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 5 authors, 2012-12-05

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Memory policy corruption fixes -stable

From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-14 09:14:31
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 17:58 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
This is a backport of the series "Memory policy corruption fixes V2". This
should apply to 3.6-stable, 3.5-stable, 3.4-stable and 3.0-stable without
any difficulty.  It will not apply cleanly to 3.2 but just drop the "revert"
patch and the rest of the series should apply.

I tested 3.6-stable and 3.0-stable with just the revert and trinity breaks
as expected for the mempolicy tests. Applying the full series in both case
allowed trinity to complete successfully. Andi Kleen reported previously
that the series fixed a database performance regression[1].

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/22/585

 include/linux/mempolicy.h |    2 +-
 mm/mempolicy.c            |  137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
I've queued up patches 2-5 for 3.2, thanks.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help