Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-02 13:03:55
Also in:
lkml
On 08/02/2012 01:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
quoted
#define DEFINE_HASH_TABLE(name, length) struct hash_table name = { .count = length, .buckets = { [0 ... (length - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }The limitation of this approach is that the struct hash_table variable must be 'static', which is a bit limiting - see for example the use of hashtable in 'struct user_namespace'.
What if we just use two possible decelerations? One of static structs and one for regular ones.
struct hash_table {
size_t bits;
struct hlist_head buckets[];
};
#define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) \
union { \
struct hash_table name; \
struct { \
size_t bits; \
struct hlist_head buckets[1 << bits]; \
} __name; \
}
#define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bit) \
static struct hash_table name = { .bits = bit, \
.buckets = { [0 ... (bit - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>