Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-08-01 22:46:01
Also in:
lkml
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-08-01 22:46:01
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:41:56AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
How would your DEFINE_HASHTABLE look like if we got for the simple 'struct hash_table' approach?
I think defining a different enclosing anonymous struct which the requested number of array entries and then aliasing the actual hash_table to that symbol should work. It's rather horrible and I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>