Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-01 18:24:04
Also in:
lkml
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-01 18:24:04
Also in:
lkml
On 08/01/2012 08:21 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:19:52PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:quoted
If we switch to using functions, we could no longer hide it anywhere (we'd need to either turn the buckets into a struct, or have the user pass it around to all functions).Create an outer struct hash_table which remembers the size?
Possible. I just wanted to avoid creating new structs where they're not really required. Do you think it's worth it for eliminating those two macros? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>