Thread (74 messages) 74 messages, 9 authors, 2011-11-12

Re: [PATCH 10/18] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-12 10:19:38
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 20:31 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
quoted
quoted
+   x_intercept = min(write_bw, freerun);
+   if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept) {
So the point of the freerun point is that we never throttle before it,
so basically all the below shouldn't be needed at all, right? 
Yes!
quoted
quoted
+           if (bdi_dirty > x_intercept / 8) {
+                   pos_ratio *= x_intercept;
+                   do_div(pos_ratio, bdi_dirty);
+           } else
+                   pos_ratio *= 8;
+   }
+
    return pos_ratio;
 }
Does that mean we can remove this whole block?
quoted
So why not add:

      if (likely(dirty < freerun))
              return 2;

at the start of this function and leave it at that?
Because we already has

        if (nr_dirty < freerun)
                break;

in the main balance_dirty_pages() loop ;)
Bah! I keep missing that ;-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help