Re: [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2011-09-06 23:34:29
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed 07-09-11 01:27:38, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 06-09-11 17:47:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 09:53 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:quoted
/* + * After a task dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() + * will look to see if it needs to start dirty throttling. + * + * If dirty_poll_interval is too low, big NUMA machines will call the expensive + * global_page_state() too often. So scale it near-sqrt to the safety margin + * (the number of pages we may dirty without exceeding the dirty limits). + */ +static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval(unsigned long dirty, + unsigned long thresh) +{ + if (thresh > dirty) + return 1UL << (ilog2(thresh - dirty) >> 1); + + return 1; +}Where does that sqrt come from?He does 2^{log_2(x)/2} which, if done in real numbers arithmetics, would result in x^{1/2}. Given the integer arithmetics, it might be twice as small but still it's some approximation...
Ah, now I realized that you probably meant to ask why does he use sqrt and not some other function... Sorry for the noise. Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>