Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 7 authors, 2011-09-06

Re: [PATCH] memcg: remove unneeded preempt_disable

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-08-25 18:50:25
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 13:46 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
RISC cpus have instruction to construct complex atomic actions by the cpu
as I have shown before for ARM. 
Right, but it only makes sense if the whole thing remains cheaper than
the trivial implementation already available.

For instance, the ARM LL/SC constraints pretty much mandate we do
preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() around them, at which point the point
of doing LL/SC is gone (except maybe for the irqsafe_this_cpu_* stuff).

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help