Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1
From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2003-08-11 22:15:24
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
Buggered if I know what Letext is doing there ???
6577 3.9% total
1157 0.0% Letext
937 0.0% direct_strnlen_user
748 440.0% filp_close
722 21.2% __copy_from_user_ll
610 2.6% page_remove_rmap
492 487.1% file_ra_state_init
452 12.4% find_get_page
405 7.6% __copy_to_user_ll
402 28.6% schedule
386 0.0% kpmd_ctor
348 4.4% __d_lookup
310 16.6% atomic_dec_and_lock
300 174.4% may_openYou can figure out what it is by reading addresses directly out of /proc/profile that would correspond to it (i.e. modifying readprofile) and correlating it with an area of text in a disassembled kernel. kpmd_ctor() is unusual; how many runs does this profile represent? Does it represent the first run? Ideally, all your kernel pmd's should be cached. If it's not the first run, then logged slab cache statistics would be interesting to determine whether this is still the case even while effective cacheing is going on or whether slab cache reaping is blowing these things away (i.e. either ineffective cacheing is happening or for some reason cacheing them isn't good enough). Of course, it would probably be better to deal with first-order effects first. On that note, how many profile hits total? How many runs is this summed together from? Which run is this (numerically in the order you ran them) if the profiles are from only one run? -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>