Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 8 authors, 2003-08-14

Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1

From: Con Kolivas <hidden>
Date: 2003-08-11 21:50:29
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:05, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:35:31AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
quoted
Degredation on kernbench is still there:
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test3       45.97      115.83      571.93     1494.50
          2.6.0-test3-mm1       46.43      122.78      571.87     1496.00
Quite a bit of extra sys time. I thought the suspected part of the sched
changes got backed out, but maybe I'm just not following it ...
Is this with or without the unit conversion fix for the load balancer?

It will be load balancing extra-aggressively without the fix.
Yes, test3-mm1 includes load balancing fix you suggested in an akpm modified 
form.

Con

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help