Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-15 01:18:06
Also in:
lkml
From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-15 01:18:06
Also in:
lkml
At some point in the past, jstultz wrote:
quoted
Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption. There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as well.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:08:56PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
No, the NUMA code in the kernel doesn't support that anyway. You have to use zholes_size, and waste some struct pages, or config_nonlinear. Either way you get 1 memblk.
I thought zholes stuff freed the struct pages. Maybe that was done by hand. Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/