Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 9 authors, 2002-10-15

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41

From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-15 01:18:06
Also in: lkml

At some point in the past, jstultz wrote:
quoted
Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption. 
There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it
has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in
order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to
be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as
well. 
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:08:56PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
No, the NUMA code in the kernel doesn't support that anyway.
You have to use zholes_size, and waste some struct pages,
or config_nonlinear. Either way you get 1 memblk.
I thought zholes stuff freed the struct pages. Maybe that was done
by hand.


Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help