Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
From: Matthew Dobson <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-15 00:36:14
Also in:
lkml
From: Matthew Dobson <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-15 00:36:14
Also in:
lkml
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
quoted
quoted
4) An ordered zone list is probably the more natural mapping.See my comments above about per zone/memblk. And you reemphasize my point, how do we order the zone lists in such a way that a user of the API can easily know/find out what zone #5 is?Could you explain how that problem is different from finding out what memblk #5 is ... I don't see the difference?
Errm... __memblk_to_node(5) I"m not saying that we couldn't add a similar interface for zones... something along the lines of: __memblk_and_zone_to_flat_zone_number(5, DMA) or some such. It just isn't there now... Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1 on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them). It will likely look the same on most architectures, too. Cheers! -Matt -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/