Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 9 authors, 2002-10-15

Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41

From: Matthew Dobson <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-15 00:36:14
Also in: lkml

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
quoted
quoted
4) An ordered zone list is probably the more natural mapping.
See my comments above about per zone/memblk.  And you reemphasize my point, how do we order the zone lists in such a way that a user of the API can easily know/find out what zone #5 is?
Could you explain how that problem is different from finding out
what memblk #5 is ... I don't see the difference?
Errm...  __memblk_to_node(5)

I"m not saying that we couldn't add a similar interface for zones... 
something along the lines of:
	__memblk_and_zone_to_flat_zone_number(5, DMA)
or some such.  It just isn't there now...

Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1 
on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them).  It will likely 
look the same on most architectures, too.

Cheers!

-Matt

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help