Re: [PATCH v3 16/52] mtd: nand: use mtd_set_ecclayout() where appropriate
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-03-05 02:26:27
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:57:24AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use the mtd_set_ecclayout() helper instead of directly assigning the mtd->ecclayout field. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <redacted> --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 17504f2..5093a3c 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c@@ -4288,7 +4288,7 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd) ecc->write_oob_raw = ecc->write_oob; /* propagate ecc info to mtd_info */ - mtd->ecclayout = ecc->layout; + mtd_set_ecclayout(mtd, ecc->layout);
I'm having trouble applying this one. For the life of me, I can't figure out where you got this context from. This block only appears much later in nand_scan_tail()... Do you think you could post a git tree with your intended changes? I may just try to pull something in like that instead. BTW, I'm not sure the OMAP refactorings are going to come in time, but I was planning to pull those directly from the TI folks (i.e., they won't be rebased on l2-mtd.git), since there's some intermingling of platform changes there. I think I can fix the conflicts fine, but FYI. Brian
mtd->ecc_strength = ecc->strength; mtd->ecc_step_size = ecc->size; -- 2.1.4