On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:57:24AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use the mtd_set_ecclayout() helper instead of directly assigning the
mtd->ecclayout field.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 17504f2..5093a3c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -4288,7 +4288,7 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
ecc->write_oob_raw = ecc->write_oob;
/* propagate ecc info to mtd_info */
- mtd->ecclayout = ecc->layout;
+ mtd_set_ecclayout(mtd, ecc->layout);
I'm having trouble applying this one. For the life of me, I can't figure
out where you got this context from. This block only appears much later
in nand_scan_tail()...
Do you think you could post a git tree with your intended changes? I may
just try to pull something in like that instead.
BTW, I'm not sure the OMAP refactorings are going to come in time, but I
was planning to pull those directly from the TI folks (i.e., they won't
be rebased on l2-mtd.git), since there's some intermingling of platform
changes there. I think I can fix the conflicts fine, but FYI.
Brian
mtd->ecc_strength = ecc->strength;
mtd->ecc_step_size = ecc->size;
--
2.1.4